The Excellence Award at the Fonds Ricœur’s Summer Workshop 2024

The Ontological Demands of Darstellung. Ricœur and the Problem of Historical Representation

Autores

  • Sara Rocca Universities of Pisa and Firenze, PhD student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2024.681

Palavras-chave:

representation, Darstellung, depiction, exhibition, history

Resumo

This paper assesses the possibility of interpreting Ricœur’s notion of representation as a form of Darstellung in the Kantian sense of exhibition (presentation). The aim is to emphasize the ontological significance of representation as Darstellung, through the consideration of the paradigmatic case of historical representations. Indeed, the necessity to adequately interpret the relationship between representation and the represented becomes more compelling when dealing with the representation of history. On the one hand, history becomes objective insofar as it is depicted in historical representations, but on the other, this depiction remains the presentation of an underlying reality that demands to be spoken of. The notion of Darstellung thus helps ensure the demand of historical representations to stand for past reality, without being reduced to mere copies of a supposedly pre-given original. This allows for a transition from the epistemological reflection upon historical representations to the ontological consideration of historicity as such.

Referências

Jean-Luc Amalric, Paul Ricœur, l’imagination vive. Une genèse de la philosophie ricœurienne de l’imagination (Paris : Hermann, 2013).

Roland Barthes, “The Reality Effect,” in The Rustle of Language, trans. Richard Howard (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), 141–148.

François Dagognet, Écriture et iconographie (Paris : Vrin, 1973).

Alfredo Ferrarin, “Kant and Imagination,” Fenomenologia e società, vol. 32 (2009), 7–18.

Alfredo Ferrarin, “Productive and Practical Imagination: What Does Productive Imagination Produce?,” in Productive Imagination: Its History, Meaning, and Significance, eds. Saulius Geniusas and Dmitri Nikulin (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2018), 29–48.

Michaël Foessel, “Les deux voies du schématisme. Ricœur et le problème de l’imagination transcendentale,ˮ in Ricœur et la pensée allemande de Kant à Dilthey, eds. Gilles Marmasse and Roberta Picardi (Paris : CNRS Éditions, 2019), 81–96.

Hans-Georg Gadamer, Truth and Method, trans. Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall (London: Continuum, 2004).

Jean Grondin, “L’art comme présentation chez Hans-George Gadamer. Portée et limites d’un concept,” Études germaniques, vol. 62 (2007), 337–349.

Martha B. Helfer, The Retreat of Representation. The Concept of Darstellung in German Critical Discourse (New York: State University of New York Press, 1996).

Emmanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Emmanuel Kant, Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Eric Matthews and Paul Guyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

Chris Lorenz, “Can History be True? Narrativism, Positivism, and the ‘Metaphorical Turn’,” History and Theory, vol. 37 (1998), 309–329.

Rudolf A. Makkreel, “Gadamer and the Problem of How to Relate Kant and Hegel to Hermeneutics,” Laval théologique et philosophique, vol. 53 (1997), 151–166.

Chiara Pavan, “La pensée de l’être comme pensée des limites. Une étude de Ricœur sur la négation dans la critique kantienne,ˮ in Ricœur et la pensée allemande de Kant à Dilthey, eds. Gilles Marmasse and Roberta Picardi (Paris : CNRS Éditions, 2019), 37–67.

Roberta Picardi, “« Penser l’histoire » après Löwith : Koselleck et Ricœur,” Revue germanique internationale, vol. 25 (2021), 119–143.

Roberta Picardi, “Temporalità, antropologia dell’esperienza storica e memoria in Koselleck e Ricoeur,” Conceptos Históricos, vol. 5 (2019), 66–97.

Paul Ricœur, History and Truth, trans. Charles A. Kelbley (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965).

Roberta Picardi, The Rule of Metaphor. The Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny, Kathleen McLaughlin, and John Costello (London: Routledge, 2003).

Roberta Picardi, Time and Narrative I, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1984).

Roberta Picardi, From Text to Action. Essays in Hermeneutics II, trans. Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson (London: Continuum, 2008).

Roberta Picardi, Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004).

Roberta Picardi, Lectures on Imagination (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2024).

Michael S. Roth, “All You’ve Got Is History,” preface to Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Hayden White (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014).

George H. Taylor, “The Deeper Significance of Ricœur’s Philosophy of Productive Imagination: The Role of Figuration,” in Productive Imagination: Its History, Meaning, and Significance, eds. Saulius Geniusas and Dmitri Nikulin (London: Rowman and Littlefield, 2018), 157–182.

Graziella Travaglini, “Imagination and Knowledge in the Metaphorology of Paul Ricœur,” Theoria, vol. 85 (2019), 383–401.

Hayden White, Metahistory. The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014).

Downloads

Publicado

2024-12-20

Edição

Secção

Varia