Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur <p><strong><em><span class="ILfuVd"><span class="hgKElc">É</span></span>tudes ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies</em> (ERRS)</strong> is an electronic, open access, peer-reviewed academic journal devoted to the study of the work of Paul Ricœur. The journal was founded in 2010 by Scott Davidson, Johann Michel and George Taylor. ERRS is interdisciplinary in scope and seeks to continue Ricœur's own dialogue across the disciplines (law, political science, sociology, anthropology, history, to name only a few). ERRS invites critical appraisals and constructive extensions of Ricœur's vast oeuvre. ERRS also welcomes original contributions from the intellectual traditions (hermeneutics, phenomenology, structuralism, analytic philosophy...) and themes (memory, history, justice, recognition...) that Ricœur engaged in his work.</p><p><strong>Editorial Direction </strong>: Prof. Ernst Wolff and Prof. Jean-Luc Amalric<strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>Editorial Secretary : </strong>Amélie Canu<strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>Editorial Board </strong>:</p><table width="424"><tbody><tr><td>Prof. Olivier Abel</td><td>Prof. Pamela Sue Anderson</td><td>Prof. John Arthos</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Marie-France Bégué</td><td>Prof. Patrick Bourgeois</td><td>Prof. Andris Breitling</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Marc Breviglieri</td><td>Prof. Jeffrey Barash</td><td>Prof. Mireille Delbraccio</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. François Dosse</td><td>Prof. Farhang Erfani</td><td>Prof. Gaelle Fiasse</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Michael Foessel</td><td>Prof. Daniel Frey</td><td>Catherine Goldenstein</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Jerôme de Gramont</td><td>Prof. Jean Greisch</td><td>Prof. Jean Grondin</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Christina Gschwandtner</td><td>Prof. Annemie Halsema</td><td>Prof. Domenico Jervolino</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Morny Joy</td><td>Prof. Maureen Junker-Kenny</td><td>Prof. Richard Kearney</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Marc de Launay</td><td>Prof. Sabina Loriga</td><td>Prof. Patricio Andrés Mena Malet</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Todd Mei</td><td>Olivier Mongin</td><td>Prof. Mirela Oliva</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. David Pellauer</td><td>Prof. Jérôme Porée</td><td>Prof. Charles Reagan</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Myriam Revault d'Allonnes</td><td>Prof. Andreea Ritivoi</td><td>Prof. Roger Savage</td></tr><tr><td>Jean-Louis Schlegel</td><td>Prof. William Schweiker</td><td>Prof. Alison Scott- Bauman</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Nicola Stricker</td><td>Prof. Páll Skúlason</td><td>Prof. John Starkey</td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Dan Stiver</td><td>Prof. Yasuhiko Sugimura</td><td><p>Prof. George Taylor</p></td></tr><tr><td>Prof. Laurent Thevenot</td><td>Prof. Gilbert Vincent</td><td><p>Prof. Mark Wallace</p><p>Prof. Johann Michel</p></td></tr></tbody></table> University Library System, University of Pittsburgh en-US Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2156-7808 <br /><strong>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: </strong><br /><br /><ol><ol><li>The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.<br /><br /></li><li>Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.<br /><br /></li><li>The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" target="_blank">Creative Commons 4.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works)</a>, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:<ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha;"><li>Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;</li><li>Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;</li><li>No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license. <br /><br /></li></ol></li><li>The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.<br /><br /></li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication <em>manuscript</em> (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.<br /><br /></li><li>Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.<br /><br /></li><li>The Author represents and warrants that:<br /><br /></li><ol style="list-style-type: lower-alpha; padding-left: 40px;"><li>the Work is the Author’s original work;</li><li>the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;</li><li>the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;</li><li>the Work has not previously been published;</li><li>the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and</li><li>the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.<br /> </li></ol><li>The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.</li></ol></ol> Introduction https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/712 <p>There is no doubt that for Ricoeur, reading is not an unthought-of act; on the contrary, it is part of his philosophical reflection. Whether it is because he reads the texts of other philosophers, commenting on them extensively, quoting them, or asserting that these texts are fundamental philosophical references to him, whether it is because he quotes, studies or comments on a wide range of extra-philosophical texts, including scientific, logical, linguistic, structuralist or literary-theoretical works, or whether it is because he himself interprets literary works and biblical or theological texts, it is easy to agree that Ricoeur has developed a conscious and intensive reading practice in his writings. The first impression left by his style is that of a thinker who favors dialogue and values intersubjectivity. Better still: could we not say that his need to feed off the texts of others bears witness to an ever-growing demand for himself to invent the creative conceptual means likely to mark his own singularity? What we are saying, in any case, is that for Ricoeur, the activity of reading is much more about sharing his readings with his own readers than about a reductive fidelity to the source text. And to be able to honor the virtue of sharing, we may have to start by avoiding all the traps of authority, especially the one into which a canonical text read by a philosopher too sure of his own reading could lead us.</p> Cristina Henrique da Costa Copyright (c) 2025 Cristina Henrique da Costa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 1 4 10.5195/errs.2025.712 Introduction https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/713 <p>There is no doubt that for Ricoeur, reading is not an unthought-of act; on the contrary, it is part of his philosophical reflection. Whether it is because he reads the texts of other philosophers, commenting on them extensively, quoting them, or asserting that these texts are fundamental philosophical references to him, whether it is because he quotes, studies or comments on a wide range of extra-philosophical texts, including scientific, logical, linguistic, structuralist or literary-theoretical works, or whether it is because he himself interprets literary works and biblical or theological texts, it is easy to agree that Ricoeur has developed a conscious and intensive reading practice in his writings. The first impression left by his style is that of a thinker who favors dialogue and values intersubjectivity. Better still: could we not say that his need to feed off the texts of others bears witness to an ever-growing demand for himself to invent the creative conceptual means likely to mark his own singularity? What we are saying, in any case, is that for Ricoeur, the activity of reading is much more about sharing his readings with his own readers than about a reductive fidelity to the source text. And to be able to honor the virtue of sharing, we may have to start by avoiding all the traps of authority, especially the one into which a canonical text read by a philosopher too sure of his own reading could lead us.</p> Cristina Henrique da Costa Copyright (c) 2025 Cristina Henrique da Costa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 5 9 10.5195/errs.2025.713 Ce que Temps et récit ne dit pas https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/714 <p>Taking as its starting point Ricœur’s theory of the act of reading in <em>Time and Narrative</em>, and his insistence on the essential lacuna in the literary text that constitutes the very space of reading, this article proposes a reading exercise applied to the same work. Through an analysis of the writing processes and reading protocols at work in the book, it first attempts to show how <em>Time and Narrative</em> is likely to affect the regime of philosophical speech. Secondly, it assesses the extent to which the writing of <em>Time and Narrative</em> is implicated in Ricœur’s propositions concerning time, the writing of philosophy and the reading of texts — whether philosophical or literary.</p> Bruno Clément Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Clément http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 10 21 10.5195/errs.2025.714 Fictions of the Self https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/709 <p>This article will consider the links between Ricœur’s respective accounts of the experience of reading and selfhood (<em>ipseity</em>). Without ignoring the hermeneutic and narrative definitions of the self, I will concentrate on the phenomenological and existential aspects of this correlation. First, I will show how Ricœur’s consideration of fiction’s effects on identity is indebted not only to the phenomenological tradition—especially Sartre’s critique of the ego and Husserl’s theory of imaginative variations—but also to phenomenological theories of reading—namely those of Ingarden, Poulet and Iser. Secondly, I will argue that some phenomenological aspects that Ricœur ascribes to reading—namely its embodied and temporal nature—could be linked to the phenomenological anchoring self in relation to fictional experiences. Finally, I will consider the problem of the “identity crisis” raised by Ricœur in relation to Musil’s <em>The Man Without Qualities</em> in light of the mixed nature of the narrative imagination in relation to the field of action. I will argue that, on the ethical horizon of selfhood that Ricœur opens by referring to axiological imagination, works of fiction like Musil’s not only provide descriptive concepts, but also a radical categorial shift.</p> Felice Maria Fiorino Copyright (c) 2025 Felice Maria Fiorino http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 22 36 10.5195/errs.2025.709 The Act of Reading in Paul Ricoeur’s Philosophy https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/715 <p>In this paper the author considers the problem of the act of reading in Paul&nbsp;Ricoeur’s philosophy. Distinguishing between the methodological level and the speculative level of this problem, it first discusses the method and style of Ricoeur’s philosophising. This can be summarised through the frame of a critical hermeneutics and, subsequently, of the philosophical fulcrum, centred on the hermeneutic–anthropological dimension and on the concept of narrative identity. The main thesis is that the ultimate justification of Ricoeur’s literary choices and his way of approaching texts and the act of reading are justified by his specific vision of the human being. Philosophical hermeneutics can lead to profile and deepen this vision.</p> Vinicio Busacchi Copyright (c) 2025 Vinicio Busacchi http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 37 54 10.5195/errs.2025.715 Science Fiction and the Challenge of Genre https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/705 <p>This article argues that Science Fiction, as a genre structured by technological metaphor and utopian displacement, exposes key limitations in Paul&nbsp;Ricœur’s hermeneutics of narrative fiction. While Ricœur famously insists on a genre-agnostic theory of narrative configuration, his own interpretive practice privileges works with genre-specific formal challenges—particularly “tales about time.” Drawing on Ricœur’s theories of utopia, productive imagination, and the mimetic arc, I propose that Science Fiction serves as a paradigmatic genre for understanding how fictional narratives operate as ethical laboratories. The paper unfolds in two parts: first, I construct a Ricœurian theory of Science Fiction by placing his treatment of utopia and ideology in dialogue with theorists such as Suvin and Jameson, arguing that Science Fiction’s cognitive estrangement and futural form demand a genre-sensitive extension of Ricœur’s model. In the second part, I analyze how technological metaphors function as productive frameworks in two exemplary texts. William&nbsp;Gibson’s <em>Neuromancer</em> deploys the metaphor of cyberspace to dramatize the refiguration of subjectivity within digital imaginaries, while Octavia&nbsp;Butler’s <em>Xenogenesis</em> trilogy reconfigures the narrative of human origin through speculative biotechnology and posthuman kinship. Across these readings, I suggest that Science Fiction not only aligns with Ricœur’s understanding of narrative as a site of ethical redescription, but also compels a revision of his framework by foregrounding genre as a structuring force in the symbolic life of fiction.</p> Kevin G. Chaves Copyright (c) 2025 Kevin G. Chaves http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 55 73 10.5195/errs.2025.705 Reading Under Circumstances https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/711 <p>This paper responds to Edward Said’s criticism that Ricoeur’s philosophy takes insufficient account of “worldliness.” Rather than simply defend Ricoeur, I take Said’s criticism as a challenge to consolidate resources in Ricoeur’s philosophy that might be useful to non-specialists skeptical of its social theoretical relevance. First, I summarize Said’s critique of Ricoeur and formulate the enduring challenge I take from it. Second, I turn to Ricoeur’s model of the threefold mimesis of action in relation to both time and space and propose that the capabilities of narrating and building he identifies should be subsumed under the more general capacity of <em>designing</em>. Third, I turn to Ernst Wolff’s interpretative social theory of the “technicity” of action, which I argue that is the most productive way of conceptualizing the central role of material (or technical) circumstances in Ricoeur’s work. Finally, to alleviate Said’s concern I suggest that Michel de Certeau’s distinction between strategies and tactics is useful for emphasizing the inherent asymmetry between actors and their technical circumstances without committing to Said’s exaggerated conclusion that this asymmetry is constitutively oppressive.</p> Blake D. Scott Copyright (c) 2025 Blake D. Scott http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 74 97 10.5195/errs.2025.711 Le rapt des drapeaux : art et mémoire anti-autoritaire 60 ans après un coup d’État au Brésil https://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/ricoeur/article/view/707 <p>This article proposes a reflection on critical memory based on works of art created in an authoritarian political context. By analyzing “antiauthoritarian” works of art, this article poses the following question: how does Paul Ricœur’s reflection on the abuses of memory help us reflect on works of art that reappropriate national symbols to denounce the manipulation of the past? The political situation in Brazil combines abuses of violence and forgetting due to its dictatorial past and an amnesty devoid of memory or justice. Works of art help establish a relationship between personal memory and collective memory: we can emphasize their critical function of denunciation and testimony. The political and festive dimension of the works of art we will analyze highlights the manipulation of memory in Brazil.</p> Vinicius Oliveira Sanfelice Copyright (c) 2025 Lucile Foucher PAO; Vinicius Oliveira Sanfelice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ 2025-10-01 2025-10-01 16 1 98 114 10.5195/errs.2025.707