Solicitude, Emotions, and Narrative in Technology Design Ethics

Auteurs-es

  • Paul Hayes TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre
  • Noel Fitzpatrick TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2024.645

Mots-clés :

émotion, éthique, technologie, récit

Résumé

L’objectif de cet article est d’abord de reconnaître le rôle de l’émotion et du sentiment dans la « petite éthique » et d’examiner ce que peuvent être leurs apports complémentaires ; puis il explore plus en détail comment le concept de la sollicitude en tant que vertu, et, plus largement, la disposition émotionnelle, sont susceptibles de contribuer à une éthique moderne de la technologie. Il montre enfin que les émotions nous aident à comprendre les technologies et les modes d’existences technologiques aujourd’hui ; la « petite éthique » de Ricœur, ainsi que sa théorie narrative, offrent un cadre qui nous aide à comprendre les aspects éthiques le plus essentiels de la pratique technologique, en montrant en particulier l’ouverture à l’autre que requiert la sollicitude et en mettant fondamentalement l’accent sur l’émotion ou le sentiment comme manières d’être au monde, et comme modes d’exister : lesquels se réalisent avec, voire même parfois à cause de la technologie et de la pratique technologique.

Bibliographies de l'auteur-e

Paul Hayes, TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

Paul Hayes is currently a postdoctoral researcher in TU Dublin working on questions of the ethics of AI and the ethics of technology more broadly. He works in association with SFI’s ADAPT Research Centre, the EUt+’s ECT Lab+ and Ideas Institute think tank, as well as TU Dublin’s Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media. Paul holds a PhD in Ethics and Human rights which he received from Trinity College Dublin in 2018.

Noel Fitzpatrick, TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

Noel Fitzpatrick is Professor of Philosophy in TU Dublin, the Dean of the Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media, and the Academic Lead of the European University of Technology’s European Culture and Technology Laboratory (ECT Lab+). He is principal investigator of multiple EC funded projects including MSCA EPISTEAM and MSCA NEST.

Références

Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Juan F. Maestre, Manuhuia Barcham, Marilyn Iriarte, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Oscar A. Lemus, Palak Dudani, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Ruotong Wang and Teresa Cerratto Pargman, “Decolonial Pathways: Our Manifesto for a Decolonizing Agenda in HCI Research and Design,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-9. CHI EA ’21 (New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021), online: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450365.

Jan Peter Bergen and Zoë Robaey, “Designing in Times of Uncertainty: What Virtue Ethics Can Bring to Engineering Ethics in the Twenty-First Century,” in Values for a Post-Pandemic Future, ed. Matthew J. Dennis, Georgy Ishmaev, Steven Umbrello and Jeroen van den Hoven. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022), 163-83, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08424-9_9.

Emmanuelle Burton, Judy Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei, Cory Siler and Sara-Jo Swiatek, Computing and Technology Ethics: Engaging Through Science Fiction (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2023).

Rafael Capurro, “Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline”, AI & SOCIETY, vol. 25, no. 1 (1 April 2010), 35-42, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0255-9.

Eoin Carney, “Depending on Practice: Paul Ricœur and the Ethics of Care,” Les Ateliers de l’éthique/The Ethics Forum, vol. 10, no. 3 (2015), 29-48, online: https://doi.org/10.7202/1037650ar.

Jiin-Yu Chen, “Virtue and the Scientist: Using Virtue Ethics to Examine Science’s Ethical and Moral Challenges”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 1 (1 February 2015), 75-94, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9522-3.

Mark Coeckelbergh, Imagination and Principles: An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning (Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007).

—, “Time Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Process, and Narrative,” Philosophy & Technology, vol. 34, no. 4 (1 December 2021), 1623-38, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00479-y.

Catherine D’ignazio and Lauren F. Klein, Data Feminism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2020).

Arturo Escobar, Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century (Durham: Duke University Press, 2018).

Noel Fitzpatrick, “Will the Real Quantified Self Please Stand Up?”, Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, ed. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021).

Luciano Floridi and Mariarosaria Taddeo, “What Is Data Ethics?”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374-2083 (28 December 2016), 20160360, online: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.

Thilo Hagendorff, “The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines,” Minds and Machines, vol. 30, no. 1 (1 March 2020), 99-120, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.

Paul Hayes and Noel Fitzpatrick, “Narrativity and Responsible and Transparent Ai Practices,” AI & SOCIETY (25 February 2024), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01881-8.

Paul Hayes, Noel Fitzpatrick and José Manuel Ferrández, “From Applied Ethics and Ethical Principles to Virtue and Narrative in AI Practices,” AI and Ethics (2024), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00472-z.

Bennett W. Helm, “Emotions as Evaluative Feelings,” Emotion Review, vol. 1, no. 3 (1 July 2009), 248-55, online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909103593.

Don Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).

Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca and Effy Vayena, “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines”, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 9 (September 2019), 389-99, online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

Asnath Paula Kambunga, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus and Ton Otto, “Decolonial Design Practices: Creating Safe Spaces for Plural Voices on Contested Pasts, Presents, and Futures,” Design Studies, vol. 86 (1 May 2023), 101170, online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101170.

David M. Kaplan, “Paul Ricœur and the Philosophy of Technology,” Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, vol. 16, no. 1/2 (26 January 2006), 42-56, online: https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2006.182.

Ashish Kothari, Ariel Salleh, Arturo Escobar, Federico Demaria and Alberto Acosta (eds.), Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary (New Delhi: Tulika Books, 2019).

Olya Kudina, “‘Alexa, Who Am I?’: Voice Assistants and Hermeneutic Lemniscate as the Technologically Mediated Sense-Making,” Human Studies, vol. 44, no. 2 (1 June 2021), 233-53, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09572-9.

Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013; reprint edition).

Joel Marks, “A Theory of Emotion,” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 42, no. 2 (1982), 227-42.

Brent Mittelstadt, “Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI”, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 11 (November 2019), 501-7, online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.

Luke Munn, “The Uselessness of AI Ethics”, AI and Ethics (23 August 2022), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w.

Martha C. Nussbaum, Cultivating Humanity. A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998; new edition).

—, “Literature and Ethical Theory: Allies or Adversaries?”, Yale Journal of Ethics, vol. 9 (1 January 2000), 5.

—, Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015; reprint edition).

—, “The Literary Imagination in Public Life,” New Literary History, vol. 22, no. 4 (1991), 877-910, online: https://doi.org/10.2307/469070.

—, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003; first edition).

Wessel Reijers and Mark Coeckelbergh, Narrative and Technology Ethics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020; first edition).

Wessel Reijers and Bert Gordijn, “Moving from Value Sensitive Design to Virtuous Practice Design,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, vol. 17, no. 2 (1 January 2019), 196-209, online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2018-0080.

Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (eds.), Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021).

Anaïs Rességuier and Rowena Rodrigues, “AI Ethics Should Not Remain Toothless! A Call to Bring Back the Teeth of Ethics,” Big Data & Society, vol. 7, no. 2 (1 July 2020), online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942541.

Paul Ricœur, Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2006; reprint edition).

—, “Love and Justice,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 21, no. 5/6 (1 September 1995), 23-39, online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453795021005-604.

—, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), online: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo3647498.html.

—, Reflections on the Just, trans. David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

—, “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling,” Critical Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 1 (1978), 143-59.

—, Time and Narrative I, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

—, Time and Narrative II, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

—, Time and Narrative III, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

Robert C. Roberts, Emotion: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Sabine Roeser, Moral Emotions and Intuitions (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302457.

—, Risk, Technology, and Moral Emotions (New York: Routledge, 2017; first edition).

Alberto Romele, Marta Severo and Paolo Furia, “Digital Hermeneutics: From Interpreting with Machines to Interpretational Machines,” AI & SOCIETY, vol. 35, no. 1 (1 March 2020), 73-86, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2.

Jean-Paul Sartre, Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions (London: Routledge, 2001; second edition).

Robert C. Solomon, “Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings: Emotions as Engagements with the World,” in Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. Robert C. Solomon (Oxford University Press, 2004), 1-18.

Steffen Steinert and Sabine Roeser, “Emotions, Values and Technology: Illuminating the Blind Spots,” Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 7, no. 3 (1 September 2020), 298-319, online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1738024.

Shannon Vallor, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018; reprint edition).

Ellen Van Stichel, “Love and Justice’s Dialectical Relationship: Ricœur’s Contribution on the Relationship between Care and Justice within Care Ethics,” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 4 (November 2014), 499-508, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9536-7.

Peter Paul Verbeek, “Cover story: Beyond Interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory,” Interactions (ACM), vol. 22, no. 3 (2015), 26-31, online: https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314.

—, “Toward a Theory of Technological Mediation A Program for Postphenomenological Research,” in Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers, ed. J.K. Berg, O. Friis and Robert C. Crease (London: Lexington Books, 2016), 189-204.

Ben Wagner, “Ethics As An Escape From Regulation. From ‘Ethics-Washing’ To Ethics-Shopping?,” in Being Profiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum 10 Years of Profiling the European Citizen, ed. Emre Bayamlioglu, Irina Baraliuc, Liisa Wilhelmina Albertha Janssens and Mireille Hildebrandt (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018), online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048550180-016.

Ernst Wolff, “Ricœur’s Polysemy of Technology and Its Reception”, in Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, ed. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021), 3-23.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2024-08-28

Numéro

Vol. 15 No. 1 (2024)

Rubrique

Articles

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Paul Hayes, Noel Fitzpatrick 2024

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 3.0 non transposé.

Les auteurs qui publient dans cette revue acceptent les termes suivants :

  1. Les auteurs conservent le droit d'auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication, l'ouvrage étant alors disponible simultanément, sous la licence Licence d’attribution Creative Commons, permettant à d'autres de partager l'ouvrage, tout en en reconnaissant la paternité et la publication initiale dans cette revue.
  2. Les auteurs peuvent conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version imprimée du texte par la revue (par ex., le dépôt institutionnel ou la publication dans un livre), accompagné d'une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.
  3. Dans l'objectif de favoriser les échanges intellectuels, les auteurs sont autorisés et encouragés à mettre leur travail en ligne (par exemple sur le site de leur institution de recherche ou sur leur site personnel), avant et au cours du processus de soumission des articles (voir The Effect of Open Access).