Solicitude, Emotions, and Narrative in Technology Design Ethics

Autores/as

  • Paul Hayes TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre
  • Noel Fitzpatrick TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2024.645

Palabras clave:

Emotion, Ethics, Technology, Narrative

Resumen

The first objective of this paper is to recognize the role of emotion and feeling in Ricœur’s “little ethics” and what they can further add to it, then to explore in more detail how solicitude as a virtue, and affective disposition more broadly, can contribute to a modern ethics of technology. Ultimately, emotions help us to understand technologies and technological ways of being today; Ricœur’s “little ethics”, along with his narrative theory, provide a framework for understanding the ethically salient aspects of technical practice, especially through the openness to the other demanded by solicitude, and essentially by emphasising emotion or feeling as a way of being in the world, and a mode of existence: one which is done with, if not sometimes because of, technology and technical practice.

Biografía del autor/a

Paul Hayes, TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

Paul Hayes is currently a postdoctoral researcher in TU Dublin working on questions of the ethics of AI and the ethics of technology more broadly. He works in association with SFI’s ADAPT Research Centre, the EUt+’s ECT Lab+ and Ideas Institute think tank, as well as TU Dublin’s Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media. Paul holds a PhD in Ethics and Human rights which he received from Trinity College Dublin in 2018.

Noel Fitzpatrick, TU Dublin; GradCAM; ECT Lab+; EUt+ Ideas Institute; SFI ADAPT Research Centre

Noel Fitzpatrick is Professor of Philosophy in TU Dublin, the Dean of the Graduate School of Creative Arts and Media, and the Academic Lead of the European University of Technology’s European Culture and Technology Laboratory (ECT Lab+). He is principal investigator of multiple EC funded projects including MSCA EPISTEAM and MSCA NEST.

Citas

Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Juan F. Maestre, Manuhuia Barcham, Marilyn Iriarte, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Oscar A. Lemus, Palak Dudani, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Ruotong Wang and Teresa Cerratto Pargman, “Decolonial Pathways: Our Manifesto for a Decolonizing Agenda in HCI Research and Design,” in Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-9. CHI EA ’21 (New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021), online: https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450365.

Jan Peter Bergen and Zoë Robaey, “Designing in Times of Uncertainty: What Virtue Ethics Can Bring to Engineering Ethics in the Twenty-First Century,” in Values for a Post-Pandemic Future, ed. Matthew J. Dennis, Georgy Ishmaev, Steven Umbrello and Jeroen van den Hoven. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022), 163-83, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08424-9_9.

Emmanuelle Burton, Judy Goldsmith, Nicholas Mattei, Cory Siler and Sara-Jo Swiatek, Computing and Technology Ethics: Engaging Through Science Fiction (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2023).

Rafael Capurro, “Digital Hermeneutics: An Outline”, AI & SOCIETY, vol. 25, no. 1 (1 April 2010), 35-42, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0255-9.

Eoin Carney, “Depending on Practice: Paul Ricœur and the Ethics of Care,” Les Ateliers de l’éthique/The Ethics Forum, vol. 10, no. 3 (2015), 29-48, online: https://doi.org/10.7202/1037650ar.

Jiin-Yu Chen, “Virtue and the Scientist: Using Virtue Ethics to Examine Science’s Ethical and Moral Challenges”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 1 (1 February 2015), 75-94, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9522-3.

Mark Coeckelbergh, Imagination and Principles: An Essay on the Role of Imagination in Moral Reasoning (Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, 2007).

—, “Time Machines: Artificial Intelligence, Process, and Narrative,” Philosophy & Technology, vol. 34, no. 4 (1 December 2021), 1623-38, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00479-y.

Catherine D’ignazio and Lauren F. Klein, Data Feminism (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2020).

Arturo Escobar, Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, New Ecologies for the Twenty-First Century (Durham: Duke University Press, 2018).

Noel Fitzpatrick, “Will the Real Quantified Self Please Stand Up?”, Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, ed. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021).

Luciano Floridi and Mariarosaria Taddeo, “What Is Data Ethics?”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 374-2083 (28 December 2016), 20160360, online: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.

Thilo Hagendorff, “The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines,” Minds and Machines, vol. 30, no. 1 (1 March 2020), 99-120, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.

Paul Hayes and Noel Fitzpatrick, “Narrativity and Responsible and Transparent Ai Practices,” AI & SOCIETY (25 February 2024), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01881-8.

Paul Hayes, Noel Fitzpatrick and José Manuel Ferrández, “From Applied Ethics and Ethical Principles to Virtue and Narrative in AI Practices,” AI and Ethics (2024), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00472-z.

Bennett W. Helm, “Emotions as Evaluative Feelings,” Emotion Review, vol. 1, no. 3 (1 July 2009), 248-55, online: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909103593.

Don Ihde, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).

Anna Jobin, Marcello Ienca and Effy Vayena, “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines”, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 9 (September 2019), 389-99, online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.

Asnath Paula Kambunga, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Heike Winschiers-Theophilus and Ton Otto, “Decolonial Design Practices: Creating Safe Spaces for Plural Voices on Contested Pasts, Presents, and Futures,” Design Studies, vol. 86 (1 May 2023), 101170, online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2023.101170.

David M. Kaplan, “Paul Ricœur and the Philosophy of Technology,” Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy, vol. 16, no. 1/2 (26 January 2006), 42-56, online: https://doi.org/10.5195/jffp.2006.182.

Ashish Kothari, Ariel Salleh, Arturo Escobar, Federico Demaria and Alberto Acosta (eds.), Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary (New Delhi: Tulika Books, 2019).

Olya Kudina, “‘Alexa, Who Am I?’: Voice Assistants and Hermeneutic Lemniscate as the Technologically Mediated Sense-Making,” Human Studies, vol. 44, no. 2 (1 June 2021), 233-53, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09572-9.

Alasdair MacIntyre, After Virtue (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2013; reprint edition).

Joel Marks, “A Theory of Emotion,” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 42, no. 2 (1982), 227-42.

Brent Mittelstadt, “Principles Alone Cannot Guarantee Ethical AI”, Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 1, no. 11 (November 2019), 501-7, online: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4.

Luke Munn, “The Uselessness of AI Ethics”, AI and Ethics (23 August 2022), online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00209-w.

Martha C. Nussbaum, Cultivating Humanity. A Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998; new edition).

—, “Literature and Ethical Theory: Allies or Adversaries?”, Yale Journal of Ethics, vol. 9 (1 January 2000), 5.

—, Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015; reprint edition).

—, “The Literary Imagination in Public Life,” New Literary History, vol. 22, no. 4 (1991), 877-910, online: https://doi.org/10.2307/469070.

—, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003; first edition).

Wessel Reijers and Mark Coeckelbergh, Narrative and Technology Ethics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020; first edition).

Wessel Reijers and Bert Gordijn, “Moving from Value Sensitive Design to Virtuous Practice Design,” Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, vol. 17, no. 2 (1 January 2019), 196-209, online: https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-10-2018-0080.

Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (eds.), Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021).

Anaïs Rességuier and Rowena Rodrigues, “AI Ethics Should Not Remain Toothless! A Call to Bring Back the Teeth of Ethics,” Big Data & Society, vol. 7, no. 2 (1 July 2020), online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720942541.

Paul Ricœur, Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2006; reprint edition).

—, “Love and Justice,” Philosophy & Social Criticism, vol. 21, no. 5/6 (1 September 1995), 23-39, online: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453795021005-604.

—, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), online: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/O/bo3647498.html.

—, Reflections on the Just, trans. David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

—, “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling,” Critical Inquiry, vol. 5, no. 1 (1978), 143-59.

—, Time and Narrative I, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

—, Time and Narrative II, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

—, Time and Narrative III, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990; new edition).

Robert C. Roberts, Emotion: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology (Cambridge University Press, 2003).

Sabine Roeser, Moral Emotions and Intuitions (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), online: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230302457.

—, Risk, Technology, and Moral Emotions (New York: Routledge, 2017; first edition).

Alberto Romele, Marta Severo and Paolo Furia, “Digital Hermeneutics: From Interpreting with Machines to Interpretational Machines,” AI & SOCIETY, vol. 35, no. 1 (1 March 2020), 73-86, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2.

Jean-Paul Sartre, Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions (London: Routledge, 2001; second edition).

Robert C. Solomon, “Emotions, Thoughts, and Feelings: Emotions as Engagements with the World,” in Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. Robert C. Solomon (Oxford University Press, 2004), 1-18.

Steffen Steinert and Sabine Roeser, “Emotions, Values and Technology: Illuminating the Blind Spots,” Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 7, no. 3 (1 September 2020), 298-319, online: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1738024.

Shannon Vallor, Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting (New York: Oxford University Press, 2018; reprint edition).

Ellen Van Stichel, “Love and Justice’s Dialectical Relationship: Ricœur’s Contribution on the Relationship between Care and Justice within Care Ethics,” Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, vol. 17, no. 4 (November 2014), 499-508, online: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-013-9536-7.

Peter Paul Verbeek, “Cover story: Beyond Interaction: a short introduction to mediation theory,” Interactions (ACM), vol. 22, no. 3 (2015), 26-31, online: https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314.

—, “Toward a Theory of Technological Mediation A Program for Postphenomenological Research,” in Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers, ed. J.K. Berg, O. Friis and Robert C. Crease (London: Lexington Books, 2016), 189-204.

Ben Wagner, “Ethics As An Escape From Regulation. From ‘Ethics-Washing’ To Ethics-Shopping?,” in Being Profiled: Cogitas Ergo Sum 10 Years of Profiling the European Citizen, ed. Emre Bayamlioglu, Irina Baraliuc, Liisa Wilhelmina Albertha Janssens and Mireille Hildebrandt (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018), online: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048550180-016.

Ernst Wolff, “Ricœur’s Polysemy of Technology and Its Reception”, in Interpreting Technology: Ricœur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, ed. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2021), 3-23.

Descargas

Publicado

2024-08-28

Número

Vol. 15 Núm. 1 (2024)

Sección

Articles

Licencia

Derechos de autor 2024 Paul Hayes, Noel Fitzpatrick

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0.


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

    2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

    3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 4.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
      1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
      2. Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
      3. No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

    4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

    5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

    6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

    7. The Author represents and warrants that:

      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
         
    8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.