Les traditions de l'imaginaire

Réflexions sur les conditions de l'imagination politique

Authors

  • Olivier Abel Fonds Ricoeur/Faculté protestante de Paris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2025.717

Keywords:

social imagination, tradition and innovation, institutions, democracy, non-congruence, plurality of co-founding traditions, Ricœur, Castoriadis, Lefort

Abstract

Ricœur's philosophy of imagination touches on the political question of power (and also the power of‘falsehood’), through the social imagination, ideology and utopia. However, this study focuses on the notion of ‘traditions of the imagination’, which Ricœur very early on linked to the idea of institutions of theimagination, thereby considerably broadening the scope of the institution. In his dialogue with Castoriadis, he shows that we must think about the instituting imagination and the instituted imagination together. Traditions of the imaginary are long-established mediations, particularly in works of art, which convey different styles of traditionality. But the constitution of a tradition is based on the interplay of innovation and sedimentation, and utopian criticism of established representations, which explores other possible configurations, will in turn establish traditionalised configurations. Here we find the terms of a discussion by Claude Lefort, as recounted by Ricœur, on the lack of foundation inherent in democracy: “For him, democracy is the first regime that is based on nothing but itself, that is to say, on emptiness. Hence its extreme fragility. I try to say, for my part, that it is always founded on its own anteriority in relation to itself.” This noncongruence of societies with themselves, which forces them to imagine themselves, is what allows them to resist a total and complete imaginary remodelling. The vibrant plurality of traditions of the imagination, which together co-founded public space and civil society, and the incessant emulsion between the already existing sedimented traditions and the poetic and critical innovation that reopens them and draws new figures from them, are essential to the political life of our societies.

References

Cornélius Castoriadis, L’Institution imaginaire de la société (Paris : Seuil, 1975).

Cornélius Castoriadis et Paul Ricœur, Dialogue sur l’histoire et l’imaginaire social, édité et préfacé par Johann Michel (Paris : INA/Éditions EHESS, Collection « Audiographie », n°15, 2016).

Edmund Husserl, La Crise des sciences européennes et la phénoménologie transcendantale, trad. Granel, (Paris : Gallimard, 1976).

Claude Lefort, Essais sur le politique (Paris : Seuil, 1986).

Pierre Legendre, Dieu au miroir, Étude sur l’institution des images (Paris : Fayard, 1994).

André Malraux, Les Voix du silence, (Paris : Gallimard, 1951).

Karl Mannheim, Le Problème des générations, trad. Mauger (Paris : Nathan, 1990).

Paul Ricœur, L’homme faillible (Paris : Aubier, 1960).

Paul Ricœur, Histoire et vérité (Paris : Seuil, 1964).

Paul Ricœur, Du texte à l’action (Paris : Seuil, 1986).

Paul Ricœur, Temps et Récit, II (Paris : Seuil, 1985).

Paul Ricœur, Temps et récit, III (Paris : Le Seuil, 1985).

Paul Ricœur, À l’école de la phénoménologie (Paris : Vrin, 1987).

Paul Ricoeur, Soi-même comme un autre (Paris : Seuil, 1990).

Paul Ricœur, Lecture 1 (Paris : Seuil, 1991).

Paul Ricœur, Lectures 2 (Paris : Seuil, 1992).

Paul Ricoeur, La Critique et la conviction (Paris : Calmann-Lévy, 1995).

Paul Ricœur, La Mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli (Paris : Seuil, 2000).

Paul Ricœur, L’Idéologie et l’utopie (Paris : Seuil, 1997).

Published

2026-02-19