La représentation religieuse chez Kant et la philosophie kérygmatique de la religion de Ricœur

Myung Su Yang

Abstract


Ricœur’s philosophy of religion follows the anthroplogy of Kant, according to which human nature is originally good and at the same time radically evil. Ricœur, however, considers the problem of evil more profoundly than Kant. He tries to find, in the religious kerygma, a deeper motivation of it than autonomy, whereas Kant, by means of allegorical interpretation, engages in the demystification of religion. The named God refers, beyond the conceptual God of Kant, to a super-abundant meaning in the midst of the meaninglessness of life and thus opens the horizen of theonomy. Theonomy makes the commandment of love into a non-violent appeal. Love combines the universal form and the particular content of the moral norm.


Keywords


Evil, Antinomy, Pure Religion, Historical Religion, Theonomy

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2012.141



Copyright (c) 2012 Myung Su Yang

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/


This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.

ISSN 2156-7808 (online)