Ce que Temps et récit ne dit pas

Authors

  • Bruno Clément Professeur émérite, université Paris 8

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2025.714

Keywords:

writing, reading, philosophical text, literature, philosophical narrative, quasi plot

Abstract

Taking as its starting point Ricœur’s theory of the act of reading in Time and Narrative, and his insistence on the essential lacuna in the literary text that constitutes the very space of reading, this article proposes a reading exercise applied to the same work. Through an analysis of the writing processes and reading protocols at work in the book, it first attempts to show how Time and Narrative is likely to affect the regime of philosophical speech. Secondly, it assesses the extent to which the writing of Time and Narrative is implicated in Ricœur’s propositions concerning time, the writing of philosophy and the reading of texts — whether philosophical or literary.

References

Paul Ricœur, Temps et récit (Paris : Le Seuil, 1983), 3 vol.

Jean-Paul Sartre, Questions de méthode (Paris, Gallimard, [1960] 1996).

Published

2025-10-01

Issue

Section

Articles