Reading Under Circumstances

Technicity and Design in Interpretative Social Theory

Autores/as

  • Blake D. Scott Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2025.711

Palabras clave:

Certeau, Design, Mimesis, Reading, Said, Technicity

Resumen

This paper responds to Edward Said’s criticism that Ricoeur’s philosophy takes insufficient account of “worldliness.” Rather than simply defend Ricoeur, I take Said’s criticism as a challenge to consolidate resources in Ricoeur’s philosophy that might be useful to non-specialists skeptical of its social theoretical relevance. First, I summarize Said’s critique of Ricoeur and formulate the enduring challenge I take from it. Second, I turn to Ricoeur’s model of the threefold mimesis of action in relation to both time and space and propose that the capabilities of narrating and building he identifies should be subsumed under the more general capacity of designing. Third, I turn to Ernst Wolff’s interpretative social theory of the “technicity” of action, which I argue that is the most productive way of conceptualizing the central role of material (or technical) circumstances in Ricoeur’s work. Finally, to alleviate Said’s concern I suggest that Michel de Certeau’s distinction between strategies and tactics is useful for emphasizing the inherent asymmetry between actors and their technical circumstances without committing to Said’s exaggerated conclusion that this asymmetry is constitutively oppressive.

Citas

Arjun Appadurai, The Future as Cultural Fact: Essays on the Global Condition (London: Verso, 2013).

Anna Borisenkova, “Reading the City: From the Inhabitant to the Flâneur,” in Paul Ricoeur in the Age of Hermeneutical Reason: Poetics, Praxis, and Critique, ed. Roger W.H. Savage (Lanham, MD: Lexignton Books, 2015), 34–52.

Marc Breviglieri, “L’espace habité que réclame l’assurance intime de pouvoir. Un essai d’approfondissement sociologique de l’anthropologie capacitaire de Paul Ricœur,” Études ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 3, no 1 (2012), 34–52.

Michel de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. Steven Randall (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984).

Mark Coeckelbergh and Wessel Reijers, “Narrative Technologies: A Philosophical Investigation of the Narrative Capacities of Technologies by Using Ricoeur’s Narrative Theory,” Human Studies, vol. 39 (2016), 325–346.

Giovanna Costanzo, “Telling the Story of Space: Between Design and Construction,” Études ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 12, no 2 (2021), 72–84.

Francesca D’Alessandris, “La durée dans la dureté. Espaces de la mémoire et mémoires de l’espace chez Paul Ricœur,” Études ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 10, no 1 (2019), 58–72.

François Dosse, Paul Ricœur. Les sens d’une vie (Paris: La Découverte, 2001).

François Dosse, Paul Ricœur et Michel de Certeau. L’histoire : entre le dire et le faire (Paris: L’Herne, 2006).

Richard J. Evans, In Defence of History (London: Granta, [1997] 2018).

Paolo Furia, “Landscape as a Text. Ricoeur and the Human Geography,” Discipline Filosofiche, vol. 30 (2020), 239-60.

Paolo Furia, “A Hermeneutic Introduction to Maps,” Études ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 12, no 2 (2021), 57–71.

Christina M. Gschwandtner, “Space and Narrative: Ricoeur and a Hermeneutic Reading of Place,” in Place, Space and Hermeneutics, ed. Bruce B. Janz (Cham: Springer, 2017), 169–182.

Quill Kukla, City Life: How Urban Dwellers and Urban Spaces Make One Another (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).

Alain Loute, “Ricoeur and E-health” in Interpreting Technology: Ricoeur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, eds. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele, and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021), 189–208.

Johann Michel, Qu’est-ce que l’herméneutique ? (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2023).

Rita Messori, “Mémoire et inscription. Temporalité et spatialité de l’architecture selon Paul Ricœur,” in Erinnerungsarbeit. Zu Paul Ricœurs Philosophie von Gedächtnis, Geschichte und Vergessen, eds. Andris Orth, and Stefan Ort, eds (Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag, 2004).

Jean-Philippe Pierron, Ricœur. Philosopher à son école (Paris: Vrin, 2016).

Jérôme Porée, “Le philosophe, l’architecte et la cité,” in L’existence vive. Douze études sur la philosophie de Paul Ricœur, ed. Jérôme Porée (Strasbourg: Presses yniversitaires de Strasbourg, 2017), 147–163.

Sebastian Purcell, “Space and Narrative: Enrique Dussel and Paul Ricoeur: The Missed Encounter,” Philosophy Today, vol. 54, no 3 (2010), 289–298.

Paul Ricoeur, “Objectivation et alienation dans l’expérience historique,” Archivio di Filosofia, vol. 45, no 2–3 (1975), 27–38.

Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, vol. 1, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press, 1984).

Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative, vol. 3, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press, 1988).

Paul Ricoeur, Lectures on Ideology and Utopia, ed. George H. Taylor (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1986).

Paul Ricoeur, From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, vol. 2, trans. Kathleen Blamey and John B. Thompson (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, [1986] 1991).

Paul Ricoeur, Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press, [2000] 2004).

Paul Ricoeur, “Architecture and Narrativity,” Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 7, no 2 (2016), 31–42.

Paul Ricoeur, “Sketch of a Plea for the Capable Human Being,” in Philosophy, Ethics & Politics: Paul Ricoeur, ed. Catherine Goldenstein, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Cambridge: Polity, [2017] 2020), 13–24.

Paul Ricoeur, “Narrative as History and as Practice,” in Philosophy, Ethics & Politics: Paul Ricoeur, ed. Catherine Goldenstein, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Cambridge: Polity, [2017] 2020), 45–58.

Edward Said, “The Text, the World, the Critic,” The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association, vol. 8, no 2 (1975), 1–23.

Paul Ricoeur, “The World, the Text, and the Critic,” in The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983), 31–53.

Karl Simms, “The Materiality and Ideality of the Text: Said and Ricoeur,” in Edward Said and the Literary, Social, and Political World, ed. Ranjan Ghosh (New York, NY: Routledge, 2009), 65–74.

Blake. D. Scott, The Rhetoricity of Philosophy: Audience in Perelman and Ricoeur after the Badiou-Cassin Debate (New York, NY: Routledge, 2025).

Marc-Antoine Vallé, “L’esquisse d’une herméneutique de l’éspace chez Paul Ricœur,” Arguments. Revue de philosophe de l’université de Montréal, vol. 2 (2007), 49–59.

Maria Cristina Vendra and Paulo Furia. “Introduction—Paul Ricœur : Thinker of Space. Envisioning a Ricœurian Spatial Turn,” Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 12, no 2 (2021), 1–7.

Ernst Wolff, Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest: interpreting the Technicity of Action (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021).

Ernst Wolff, “Ricoeur’s Polysemy of Technology and Its Reception,” in Interpreting Technology: Ricoeur on Questions Concerning Ethics and Philosophy of Technology, ed. Wessel Reijers, Alberto Romele, and Mark Coeckelbergh (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 2021), 3–25.

Descargas

Publicado

2025-10-01

Número

Sección

Articles