Paul Ricœur and Metaphysics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2024.680Keywords:
metaphysics, ontology, ontotheology, certainty, consentAbstract
In twentieth-century France, the word “metaphysics” had connotations of closed systems which claimed certainty for themselves. As a result, few dared to engage in metaphysical speculation. Ricœur, however, rejected this prevalent definition because he believed it came from Heidegger’s procrustean reading of the history of philosophy. While agreeing that certainty and closure were neither desirable nor possible, Ricœur did make metaphysical claims. Following Jaspers’s revival of pre-modern apophatic metaphysics for which transcendence cannot be comprehended, Ricœur, in his early work, argued for “critical realism” against neo-Kantian idealism, “original affirmation” against Sartrean negativity, and the “metaphysical choice” of human freedom’s consent to the unchosen features of reality.
References
Olivier Abel, “Mémoire, livre, histoire chez Paul Ricœur,” Revue de la BNF, vol. 51, no 3 (2015), 7–13.
Jean-Luc Amalric, “Act, Sign and Objectivity: Jean Nabert’s Influence on the Ricœurian Phenomenology of the Will,” in A Companion to Ricœur’s Freedom and Nature, ed. Scott Davidson (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2018), 17–36.
Jean-Luc Amalric, “Affirmation originaire, attestation et reconnaissance : Le cheminement de l’anthropologie philosophique ricœurienne,” Études Ricœuriennes/Ricœur Studies, vol. 2, no 1 (2011), 12–34.
Jean-Luc Amalric, “Finitude, Culpability, and Suffering: The Question of Evil in Ricœur,” in A Companion to Ricœur’s Fallible Man, ed. Scott Davidson (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2019), 179–200.
Barnabas Aspray, “Faith, Science, and the Wager for Reality: Meillassoux and Ricœur on Post-Kantian Realism,” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 84, no 2 (2023), 133–156.
Barnabas Aspray, Ricœur at the Limits of Philosophy: God, Creation, and Evil (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022).
Ian G. Barbour, Issues in Science and Religion (Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 1966).
Ian G. Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms: A Comparative Study in Science and Religion (Manhattan: Harper & Row, 1974).
Elena Būgaitè, “Metafora E Metafisica Nel Pensiero Di Paul Ricœur,” Rivista Di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica, vol. 100, no 1 (2008), 49–72.
Albert Camus, L’homme révolté, 30th ed. (Paris: Gallimard, 1954).
Albert Camus, The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt, trans. Anthony Bower (London: Vintage, 1991).
Clare Carlisle, Spinoza’s Religion: A New Reading of the Ethics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021).
Pierre Colin, “Herméneutique et philosophie reflexive,” in Paul Ricœur : les métamorphoses de la raison herméneutique, ed. Jean Greisch and Richard Kearney (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1991).
John Cottingham, “Editorial Introduction,” in René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. John Cottingham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), xviii—xxxviii.
René Descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, 2nd ed., ed. John Cottingham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).
Mikel Dufrenne and Paul Ricœur, Karl Jaspers et la philosophie de l’existence (Paris: Seuil, 1947).
Kevin W. Hector, Theology without Metaphysics: God, Language, and the Spirit of Recognition (Cambridge: University Press, 2011).
Martin Heidegger, “Die Onto-Theo-Logische Verfassung Der Metaphysik,” in Identity and Difference, ed. Joan Stambaugh (Manhattan: Harper & Row, 1969).
Martin Heidegger, “The Onto-Theo-Logical Constitution of Metaphysics,” in Identity and Difference, ed. Joan Stambaugh (Manhattan: Harper & Row, 1969.
Dominique Janicaud, Heidegger in France, trans. David Pettigrew and François Raffoul (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2015).
Karl Jaspers, “On My Philosophy,” in Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre, ed. Walter Kaufman (New York: Meridian Books, 1956).
Karl Jaspers, Philosophie, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1948).
Karl Jaspers, Philosophy, vol. 3, trans. E. B. Ashton (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969).
Karl Jaspers, Philosophy, vol. 1, trans. E. B. Ashton, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969 [1932]).
Emmanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Paul Guyer (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
Richard Kearney, On Paul Ricœur: The Owl of Minerva (London: Taylor & Francis, 2017).
André LaCocque and Paul Ricœur, Thinking Biblically: Exegetical and Hermeneutical Studies, trans. David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).
Jean-Luc Marion, Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness, trans. Jeffrey L. Kosky (Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 2002).
Jean-Luc Marion, Étant Donné: Essai d’une Phénoménologie de La Donation (Paris: PUF, 1997).
Jean-Luc Marion, God Without Being: Hors-Texte, trans. Thomas Carlson (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
J. Colin McQuillan, “Kant, Heidegger, and the In/Finitude of Human Reason”, CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 17, no 3 (2017), 81.
Jean Nabert, Elements for an Ethic, trans. William Petrek (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969).
Kenneth Oakes, Karl Barth on Theology and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Alan Olson, Transcendence and Hermeneutics: An Interpretation of the Philosophy of Karl Jaspers (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1979).
Philosophie et Vérité, Documentary, réal. Jean Flechet, 50 mn, 1965.
Robert Piercey, “Too Many Hegels? Ricœur’s Relation to German Idealism Reconsidered,” in The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Phenomenology, ed. Cynthia D. Coe (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021), 547–565.
Paul Ricœur, Anthropologie philosophique, ed. Johann Michel and Jérôme Porée (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2013).
Paul Ricœur, “Evil, A Challenge to Philosophy and Theology,” in Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination, ed. Mark I. Wallace, trans. David Pellauer (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995), 249–261.
Paul Ricœur, Fallible Man, trans. Charles A. Kelbley (New York: Fordham University Press, 1986).
Paul Ricœur, Finitude et culpabilité (Paris: Éditions Points, 2009).
Paul Ricœur, Freedom and Nature: The Voluntary and the Involuntary, trans. Erazim Kohák (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1966 [1950]).
Paul Ricœur, “From Metaphysics to Moral Philosophy,” Philosophy Today, vol. 40, no 4 (1996).
Paul Ricœur, Gabriel Marcel et Karl Jaspers: philosophie du mystère et philosophie du paradoxe (Paris: Éditions du Temps présent, 1948).
Paul Ricœur, Histoire et Vérité (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2001).
Paul Ricœur, History and Truth, trans. Charles Kelbley (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965).
Paul Ricœur, “Intellectual Autobiography,” in The Philosophy of Paul Ricœur, ed. Lewis Hahn, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: Open Court, 1995), 3–58.
Paul Ricœur, La Métaphore vive (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1975).
Paul Ricœur, Le volontaire et l’involontaire (Paris: Aubier, 1949).
Paul Ricœur, Lectures on Imagination, ed. George H. Taylor, Robert D. Sweeney, Jean-Luc Amalric, and Patrick F. Crosby (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2024).
Paul Ricœur, ”L’herméneutique du témoignage,” in Lectures 3 : Aux frontières de la philosophie (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1994).
Paul Ricœur, Méthode réflexive appliquée au problème de Dieu chez Lachelier et Lagneau (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2017).
Paul Ricœur, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
Paul Ricœur, Philosophical Anthropology, ed. Jérôme Porée and Johann Michel, trans. David Pellauer (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016).
Paul Ricœur, Réflexion faite (Paris: Éditions Esprit, 1995).
Paul Ricœur, “Reply to G.B. Madison,” in The Philosophy of Paul Ricœur, ed. Lewis Hahn (Chicago: Open Court, 1995), v. 22:93—95.
Paul Ricœur, “Retour à Hegel (Jean Hyppolite),” in Lectures 2 : la contrée des philosophes (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1999), 173–189.
Paul Ricœur, Soi-même comme un autre (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2015).
Paul Ricœur, “The Hermeneutics of Testimony,” trans. David Stewart and Charles Reagan, Anglican Theological Review, vol. 61, no 4 (1979), 435–461.
Paul Ricœur, The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-Disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language, trans. Robert Czerny, Kathleen McLaughlin, and John Costello (London: Routledge, 1978).
Paul Ricœur, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan (Boston: Beacon, 1969).
Paul Ricœur and André LaCocque, Penser la bible (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1998).
Mary-Jane Rubenstein, Strange Wonder: The Closure of Metaphysics and the Opening of Awe (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009).
Alison Scott-Baumann, Ricœur and the Negation of Happiness (London: Bloomsbury, 2013).
Dan Stiver, Ricœur and Theology (London: T&T Clark, 2012).
Tamás Tóth, “The Graft, The Residue, And Memory: Two Conversations with Paul Ricœur,” in Between Suspicion and Sympathy: Paul Ricœur’s Unstable Equilibrium, ed. Andrzej Wierciński (Toronto: Hermeneutic Press, 2003).
Merold Westphal, Overcoming Onto-Theology: Toward a Postmodern Christian Faith (New York: Fordham Univ Press, 2001).
Hing-Wah Yip, What Metaphysics of Morality in View? (Leuven: Catholic University of Leuven, 2002).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Barnabas Aspray
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 4.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
- No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
