An Ethics Of Discomfort: Supplementing Ricœur On Translation

Lisa Foran

Abstract


This article compares Paul Ricoeur and Jacques Derrida on the theme of translation and in particular the ethical implications of the different ways in which they approach the untranslatable.  While Ricoeur’s account of translation as linguistic hospitality does offer a model for an ethical encounter with the other, I argue that this account does not go far enough. My central claim is that Ricoeur’s treatment of translation overemphasizes the movement of appropriation and integration.  While it may not be his intention, this emphasis could lead to a certain kind of complacency that would challenge the ethical claims Ricoeur makes in favour of translation as a paradigm.  I propose to supplement Ricoeur’s hospitality with Derrida’s untranslatable, in order to create a situation of constant discomfort thereby guarding against ethical complacency.


Keywords


Ricoeur, Derrida, translation, ethics

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2015.285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Lisa Foran

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.

ISSN 2156-7808 (online)