At the Limits of Narrative. Unintelligibility and the (Im)possibilities of Self-Disclosure in the Asylum Claiming Process.

Authors

  • Lucie Robathan McGill University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2022.578

Keywords:

Narrative, Intelligibility, Language, Time, Asylum

Abstract

This paper offers an intervention into the notion of narrativity. It aims to refract Ricœur’s hermeneutics of the subject through a more expanded account of the political dimension of narrative, both to situate the narrative self politically, and to flesh out the ethico-political (im)possibilities of self-disclosure. Focusing on the process of claiming asylum as an instance of politically precarious self-disclosure in which narrative is demanded as a marker of truthful identity, it will explore the limits of narrative as the mode through which subjectivity is made intelligible. Through an analysis of the residues of power in the institution of language that qualify the emergence of the speaking subject and the socio-political assumptions we can excavate from the notion of narrative time, this paper will suggest that narrative unintelligibility could have politically transformative potential.

References

Giorgio Agamben, The Sacrament of Language. An Archaeology of the Oath, trans. Adam Kotsko (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).

Robert F. Barsky, Constructing a Productive Other. Discourse Theory and the Convention Refugee Hearing (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1994).

Robert Beneduce, “The Moral Economy of Lying. Subjectcraft, Narrative Capital, and Uncertainty in the Politics of Asylum,” Medical Anthropology, vol. 34/6 (2015), 551-71, https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1074576.

Charles Briggs (ed.), Disorderly Discourse. Narrative, Conflict, and Inequality (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).

Carol Bohmer and Amy Shuman, “Producing Epistemologies of Ignorance in the Political Asylum Application Process,” Identities. Global Studies in Culture and Power, vol. 14/5 (2007), 603-29, https://doi.org/10.1080/10702890701662607.

Helen M. Buss, “Women’s Memoirs and the Embodied Imagination. The Gendering of Genre that Makes History and Literature Nervous,” in Morny Joy (ed.), Paul Ricœur and Narrative. Context and Contestation (Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1997), 87-96.

Judith Butler, Excitable Speech. A Politics of the Performative (New York and London: Routledge, 1997).

—, Giving an Account of Oneself (New York: Fordham University Press, 2005).

Hilary Evans Cameron, “Refugee Status Determinations and the Limits of Memory,” International Journal of Refugee Law, vol. 22/4 (2010), 469-511.

Cathy Caruth, Unclaimed Experience. Trauma, Narrative and History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).

Natasha Carver, “The Silent Backdrop. Colonial Anxiety at the Border,” Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 32/2 (June 2019), https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12238.

Deidre Conlon, “Becoming Legible and ‘Legitimized’. Subjectivation and Governmentality among Asylum Seekers in Ireland,” in Philip Kretsedemas, Jorge Capetillo-Ponce and Glenn Jacobs (eds), Migrant Marginality. A Transnational Perspective (New York: Routledge, 2013), 366-97.

François Crépeau, Droit d’asile. De l’hospitalité aux contrôles migratoires (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1995).

Catherine Dauvergne, “Refugee Law as Perpetual Crisis,” in Satvinder Singh Juss and Colin Harvey (eds), Contemporary Issues in Refugee Law (Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2013), 13-30.

Kamena Dorling, Marchu Girma and Natasha Walter. Refused. The Experiences of Women Refused Asylum in the UK (London: Women for Refugee Women, 2012), https://www.refugeewomen.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/women-for-refugee-women-reports-refused.pdf.

Diana Eades, “Testing the Claims of Asylum Seekers. The Role of Language Analysis,” Language Assessment Quarterly, vol. 6/1 (2009), 30-40, https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300802606523.

Frantz Fanon, Black Skin, White Masks, trans. Charles Lam Markmann (London: Pluto, 2008).

Gaëlle Fiasse, “Ricœur’s Hermeneutics of the Self. On the In-between of the Involuntary, the Voluntary, and Narrative Identity,” Philosophy Today, vol. 58/1 (2014), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday20131223.

Michel Foucault, “Truth and Power,” in Colin Gordon (ed.), Power/Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977, trans. Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham and Kate Sober (New York: Pantheon Books, 1980), 109-33.

—, “Inaugural Lecture, April 2, 1981,” in Fabienne Brion and Bernard E. Harcourt (eds), Wrong-Doing, Truth-Telling. The Function of Avowal in Justice, trans. Stephen W. Sawyer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014), 22-6.

—, “Technologies of the Self,” in Luther H. Martin et al. (eds), Technologies of the Self. A Seminar with Michel Foucault (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1988), 16-49.

Jean Greisch, Paul Ricœur, l’itinérance du sens (Grenoble: J. Millon, 2001).

Melanie Griffiths, “Anonymous Aliens? Questions of Identification in the Detention and Deportation of Failed Asylum Seekers,” Population, Space and Place, vol. 18/6 (2012), 715-27, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1723.

—, “Out of Time. The Temporal Uncertainties of Refused Asylum Seekers and Immigration Detainees,” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 40/12 (2014), 1991-2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2014.907737.

Home Office, Language Analysis, Version 21.0 (UK: Home Office, 2018), 6, online document: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/685203/Language-analysis-AI-v21.0EXT.pdf.

—, Asylum Policy Instruction. Asylum Interviews, Version 7.0 (UK: Home Office, 2019), 5.1, online document: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/807031/asylum-interviews-v7.0ext.pdf.

Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Assessment of Credibility in Claims for Refugee Protection (Canada: Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, January 31, 2004), 1.2, online document: https://irb-cisr.gc.ca/en/legal-policy/legal-concepts/Pages/Credib.aspx#n1.

Marco Jacquemet, “Crosstalk 2.0. Asylum and Communicative Breakdowns,” Text & Talk, vol. 31/4 (2011), 475-97, https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2011.023.

Toni Johnson, “On Silence, Sexuality and Skeletons. Reconceptualizing Narrative in Asylum Hearings,” Social & Legal Studies, vol. 20/1 (2011), 57-78, https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910391205.

Olga Jubany, Screening Asylum in a Culture of Disbelief. Truths, Denials, and Skeptical Borders (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).

Walter Kälin, “Troubled Communication. Cross-Cultural Misunderstandings in the Asylum-Hearing,” International Migration Review, vol. 20/2 (1986), 230-41, https://doi.org/10.2307/2546033.

Katrijn Maryns, The Asylum Speaker. Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure (London and New York: Routledge, 2014).

Gillian McFadyen, “Memory, Language and Silence. Barriers to Refuge Within the British Asylum System,” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, vol. 17/2 (2019), 168-84, https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1429697.

Johann Michel, Ricœur and the Post-Structuralists. Bourdieu, Derrida, Deleuze, Foucault, Castoriadis, trans. Scott Davidson (London and New York: Rowman and Littlefield International, 2014).

Helen Muggeridge and Chen Maman, Unsustainable. The Quality of Initial decision Making in Women’s Asylum Claims (UK: Asylum Aid, 2011), https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4d34360421f2.pdf.

Peter L. Patrick, Monika S. Schmid and Karin Zwaan (eds), Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Current Perspectives and New Directions (Cham: Springer 2019).

Paul Ricœur, “Narrative Time,” Critical Inquiry, vol. 7/1 (Fall 1980).

—, Time and Narrative, Volume 1, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984-1988).

—, “Entretiens de Paul Ricœur avec Carlos Oliveira,” in Christian Bouchindhomme and Rainer Rochlitz (eds), “Temps et récit” de Paul Ricœur en débat (Paris: Cerf, 1990).

—, “Life. A Story in Search of a Narrator,” in Mario J. Valdés (ed.), A Ricœur Reader. Reflection and Imagination (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1991), 425-37.

—, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).

—, “The Creativity of Language,” in Richard Kearney (ed.), States of Mind. Dialogues with Contemporary Thinkers on the European Mind (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995).

—, The Just, trans. David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000).

—, Reflections on The Just, trans. David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

—, “La souffrance n’est pas la douleur,” in Claire Marin and Nathalie Zaccaï-Reyners (eds), Souffrance et douleur. Autour de Paul Ricœur (Paris: Puf, 2013), 18-48.

Mark Rifkin, Beyond Settler Time. Temporal Sovereignty and Indigenous Self-Determination (Durham: Duke University Press, 2017).

Lucie Robathan, “On Being Disbelieved. Undergoing Epistemic Injustice in the Asylum Claiming Process” (working paper, School of Religious Studies, McGill University, Montreal, 2022).

Cécile Rousseau, François Crépeau, Patricia Foxen, and France Houle, “The Complexity of Determining Refugeehood. A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Decision-making Process of the Canadian Immigration and Refugee Board,” Journal of Refugee Studies, vol. 15/1 (2002), 43-70.

Imogen Tyler, “‘Welcome to Britain.’ The Cultural Politics of Asylum,” European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 9/2 (May 2006), 185-202, https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549406063163.

United Nations. 28 July 1951. Convention on the status of refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/4ca34be29.pdf.

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1 (Reedited Geneva, January 1992), http://www.unhcr.org/4d93528a9.pdf.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-07

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 1 (2022)

Section

Varia

License


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

    2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

    3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 4.0 License (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works), or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
      1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
      2. Noncommercial—other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
      3. No Derivative Works—other users (including Publisher) may not alter, transform, or build upon this Work,with the understanding that any of the above conditions can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

    4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

    5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

    6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

    7. The Author represents and warrants that:

      1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
      2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
      3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
      4. the Work has not previously been published;
      5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
      6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
         
    8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.