Adolf Grünbaum critique de Ricœur

Philippe Lacour

Abstract


In this article, I try to reconstitute the inchoative debate that took place between Ricœur and Grünbaum concerning the epistemology of Freudian psychoanalysis. The debate was more inchoative than effective because of its asymmetry (Grünbaum read and analyzed Ricœur, but the converse is far from certain). First, I will underline the originality of Ricœur’s theory of motivation (as a mix of reason and cause) and causality (teleological). Then, I will examine the rest of Grünbaum’s objections: the overvaluation of clinical relationship and language, the ontological specificity of psychical reality, the narrative originality of the psychoanalytical explanation and the status of symbol. I finally conclude by underlining the added value of the debate concerning the specificity o

Keywords


Grünbaum, Epistemology, Motivation, Reason, Cause



DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2016.341

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Philippe Lacour

License URL: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.

This journal is published by the University Library System, University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press.

ISSN 2156-7808 (online)