Europe in Front of its Colonial Past. The Question of Historiography

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/errs.2021.525

Keywords:

Ricœur, Historiography, Colonization, Injustice.

Abstract

This paper employs Paul Ricœur’s insights to examine how European states should approach their colonial past. First, I explore the significance of historical knowledge for people from formerly colonized countries through the views of several anti-colonial thinkers. Then, referring to Ricoeur’s analyses in History and Truth, Time and Narrative and Memory, History, Forgetting, I examine the grounds and the legitimacy, of a historiography of colonization. I argue that European states should make the history of colonization part of their school curricula, as an expression of Europeans’ debt to the victims of the colonial past, and as a way to prevent the repetition of the colonial crimes.

Author Biography

Anna Milioni, King's College London

I am a PhD student at King’s College London’s Philosophy Department. I hold a Research Master’s degree in Ethics and Political Philosophy from the KU Leuven, which I obtained with a scholarship from the Onassis Foundation. I also hold a Master’s degree in Philosophy of Law and a University degree in Law from the University of Athens. My research interests revolve around migration, justice, democracy and political participation.

References

Olivier Abel et Jérôme Porée, Le vocabulaire de Paul Ricœur (Paris: Ellipses, 2007)

Ana Maria Alonso, “The Effects of Truth: Re‐Presentations of the Past and the Imagining of Community,” Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 1 (1988), 33-57

Pierre Boilley, “Loi du 23 février 2005, colonisation, indigènes, victimisations. Évocations binaires, représentations primaires,” Politique africaine, vol. 98/2 (2005), 131-40

Aimé Césaire, Discourse on Colonialism, trans. Joan Pinkham (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000)

Alioune Diop, “Colonialisme et nationalisme culturels,” Présence africaine, vol. 4 (1955), 5-15

François Dosse, “L’histoire entre la guerre des mémoires et la justice,” Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 8/1 (2017), 67-82

Uta Fenske, Daniel Groth, Klaus-Michael Guse and Bärbel Kuhn, Colonialism and Decolonization in National Historical Cultures and Memory Politics in Europe (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 2015)

Antoine Garapon, Peut-on réparer l’histoire? Colonisation, esclavage, shoah (Paris: Odile Jacob, 2008)

Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past: The Semantics of Historical Time, trans. Keith Tribe (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985)

Mathilde Lambert, Jonathan Lachal, Marie Rose Moro et Malika Mansouri, “Identité postcoloniale et rapport à l’école,” L’autre, vol. 3/20 (2019), 311-22

Sébastien Ledoux, “'Devoir de mémoire': The Post-colonial Path of a Post-national Memory in France. A Study of the Development of the Taubira Law,” National Identities, vol. 15/3 (2013), 239-56

Sandrine Lemaire, “National History and Colonial History Parallel Histories (1961– 2006),” in Pascal Blanchard, Sandrine Lemaire, Nicolas Bancel, and Thomas Dominic (eds), Colonial Culture in France since the Revolution (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013), 420-31

Elísio Macamo, “Negotiating Modernity. From Colonialism to Globalization,” in id. (ed.), Negotiating Modernity. Africa’s Ambivalent Experience, Africa in the New Millennium (Dakar: Codesria Books, 2005), 1-16

Marianne Moyaert, “Interreligious Learning, Ricœur and the Problem of Testimonial and Hermeneutical Injustice,” Journal of Nationalism Memory and Language Politics, vol. 13/2 (2019), 205-23

Mark Osiel, Mass Atrocity, Collective Memory, and the Law (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 2000)

Sebastian Purcell, “Multicultural Education: The Translation Model,” Studia Paedagogica Ignatiana, vol. 18/1 (2015), 129-48

———, “Recognition and Exteriority: Towards a Recognition-Theoretic Account of Globalization,” Études Ricoeuriennes/Ricoeur Studies, vol. 2/1 (2011), 51-69

———, “Space and Narrative. Enrique Dussel and Paul Ricœur: The Missed Encounter,” Philosophy Today, vol. 54/3 (2010), 289-98, online: doi: 10.5840/philtoday201054316

Paul Ricœur, History and Truth, trans. Charles A. Kelbley (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1965)

———, “Introduction,” in Cultures and Time (Paris: The Unesco Press, 1976), 13-33

———, “Introduction,” in Honorat Aguessy (ed.), Time and the Philosophies (Paris: The Unesco Press, 1977), 13-30

———, “La question colonial,” La Réforme, vol. 3 (1947)

———, Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).

———, The Course of Recognition, trans. David Pellauer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005).

———, The Symbolism of Evil, trans. Emerson Buchanan (New York: Harper and Row, 1967)

———, Time and Narrative, Volume 3, trans. Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990).

———, Oneself as Another, trans. Kathleen Blamey (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).

———, “Vraie et fausse paix,” Autres temps. Cahiers d’éthique sociale et politique, vol. 76/1 (2003), 51-65

Roger Savage, “Colonialist Ruinations and the Logic of Hope,” in Greg S. Johnson, and Dan R. Stiver (eds), Paul Ricœur and the Task of Political Philosophy, (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2012), 201-220

Olúfẹ́mi Táíwò, How Colonialism Pre-Empted Modernity in Africa (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2010)

Canute Tangwa, “French Revisionism: Case of Positive Role of French Colonisation,” The Cameroun Post (December 18, 2005) https://www.postnewsline.com/2005/12/french_revision.html

Sékou Touré, “The Political Leader Considered as the Representative of a Culture,” Présence africaine, vol. 24-25 (1959), 112-24

Ernst Wolff, Lire Ricœur depuis la périphérie. Décolonisation, modernité, herméneutique (Bruxelles: Éditions de l’université de Bruxelles, 2021)

———, “Of What Is ‘Ricœur’ the Name? Or, Philosophising at the Edge”, in Between Daily Routine and Violent Protest. Interpreting the Technicity of Action (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2021)

Downloads

Published

2021-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles